Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Publication date

2024-11-13

Authors

Wright, Simonne
Karyotaki, Eirini
Cuijpers, Pim
Bisson, Jonathan
Papola, Davide
Witteveen, Anke B
Back, Sudie E
Bichescu-Burian, Dana
Capezzani, Liuva
Cloitre, Marylene

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Available empirical evidence on participant-level factors associated with dropout from psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is both limited and inconclusive. More comprehensive understanding of the various factors that contribute to study dropout from cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus (CBT-TF) is crucial for enhancing treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Using an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) design, we examined participant-level predictors of study dropout from CBT-TF interventions for PTSD. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials comparing CBT-TF with waitlist control, treatment-as-usual or another therapy. Academic databases were screened from conception until 11 January 2021. Eligible interventions were required to be individual and in-person delivered. Participants were considered dropouts if they did not complete the post-treatment assessment. FINDINGS: The systematic literature search identified 81 eligible studies (n=3330). Data were pooled from 25 available CBT-TF studies comprising 823 participants. Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans. Bivariate and multivariate analyses indicated that military personnel/veterans (RR 2.37) had a significantly greater risk of dropout than civilians. Furthermore, the chance of dropping out significantly decreased with advancing age (continuous; RR 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the risk of premature termination from CBT-TF among younger adults and military veterans/personnel. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Understanding predictors can inform the development of retention strategies tailored to at-risk subgroups, enhance engagement, improve adherence and yield better treatment outcomes.

Keywords

Adult, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy

Citation

Wright, S, Karyotaki, E, Cuijpers, P, Bisson, J, Papola, D, Witteveen, A B, Back, S E, Bichescu-Burian, D, Capezzani, L, Cloitre, M, Devilly, G J, Elbert, T, Mello, M, Ford, J D, Grasso, D, Gamito, P, Gray, R, Haller, M, Hunt, N, Kleber, R J, König, J, Kullack, C, Laugharne, J, Liebman, R, Lee, C W, Lely, J, Markowitz, J C, Monson, C, Nijdam, M J, Norman, S B, Olff, M, Orang, T M, Ostacoli, L, Paunovic, N, Petkova, E, Resick, P, Rosner, R, Schauer, M, Schmitz, J M, Schnyder, U, Smith, B N, Vujanovic, A A, Zang, Y, Duran, É P, Neto, F L, Seedat, S & Sijbrandij, M 2024, 'Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults : An individual participant data meta-analysis', BMJ Mental Health, vol. 27, no. 1, e301159. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301159