A 'farewell to literature' in 1860? The problem of literariness in the work of Multatuli (1820-1887)
Publication date
2011-06-15
Editors
Frederiksson, M.
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Today, Multatuli (1820-1887) is considered as one of the most important Dutch writers. His stance towards literature, however, was highly ambivalent. At the one hand, he realised that writing fiction was the best way to gain personal and political attention. At the same time, he highly mistrusted the instrument of (sentimental) fiction to engage readers. The same ambivalence dominates his presentation as a writer: Multatuli mythologized himself, but he also argued for a sincere, ‘authentic’ writership. In my presentation, I want to analyze these seemly contradictory ideas about fictionalizing the world and the self. Some concepts in literary sociology, such as ‘posture’ (Jérôme Meizoz) or ‘the double life of writers’ (Bernard Lahire) help to understand the logic of Multatuli’s ideas about fiction.
Keywords
Scientific
Citation
Ham, L J 2011, A 'farewell to literature' in 1860? The problem of literariness in the work of Multatuli (1820-1887). in M Frederiksson (ed.), Current Issues in European Cultural Studies : June 15–17, Norrköping, Sweden 2011 . Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, vol. 62, Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping, pp. 467-473. < http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/062/048/ecp11062048.pdf >