Authority Defied: Need for Cognitive Closure Influences Regulatory Control When Resisting Authority

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , jopy12058.pdf (175.51 KB)

Publication date

2014-08

Authors

Damen, Tom G EISNI 0000000419471494
van Leeuwen, MatthijsISNI 0000000387267762
Dijksterhuis, Ap
van Baaren, Rick B.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

The present studies examined whether differences in need for cognitive closure (NCC) were related to differences in regulatory control when confronted with authority. In two studies, levels of regulatory control were measured when participants resisted (Study 1; N = 46) or prepared to resist the influence attempt of an authority figure (Study 2; N = 50). Results showed that resisting the influence attempt from a high-authority figure was more depleting for participants higher in NCC compared to individuals lower in NCC. However, when they were given instructions and time to prepare the act of resistance, individuals high in NCC actually showed an increase in regulatory control. Authority is usually viewed as a general principle of influence; however, the present studies suggest that there are individual differences that influence how people may experience interactions with authorities.

Keywords

SELF-CONTROL, RESOURCE-DEPLETION, LIMITED RESOURCE, OBEDIENCE, BEHAVIOR, AUTHORITARIANISM, RESISTANCE, FAILURE

Citation

Damen, T G E, van Leeuwen, M L, Dijksterhuis, A & van Baaren, R B 2014, 'Authority Defied : Need for Cognitive Closure Influences Regulatory Control When Resisting Authority', Journal of Personality, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12058