Fluorinated steroids do not improve outcome of isolated atrioventricular block
Files
Publication date
2016-12-15
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Introduction Congenital atrioventricular block (CAVB) is a rare disorder with a significant morbidity and mortality. Consensus regarding the prescription and efficacy of prenatal corticosteroids is lacking. This nationwide study was initiated to evaluate the effects of prenatal treatment with corticosteroids on the outcome of CAVB in The Netherlands. Methods All fetuses identified with isolated congenital AVB-II° or AVB-III° in any of the eight academic fetal heart centers of The Netherlands between 2003 and 2013 were included and reviewed. Results Fifty-six fetuses were included. Fourteen (25%) fetuses were treated with dexamethasone. We found no differences between the steroid-treated and untreated cases regarding in utero progression of the AVB (63% vs 67% respectively), survival to birth (86% vs 84%), pacemaker implantations (74% vs 58%) or long-term dilated cardiomyopathy (13% vs 17%). Steroid treated fetuses demonstrated more in utero growth restriction (38% vs 11%). Conclusion No benefit from prenatal corticosteroid treatment was demonstrated for fetuses with isolated CAVB in this study. However, we found negative side effects. Our data provide no evidence to support the routine administration of corticosteroids for the treatment of fetal CAVB.
Keywords
Antibodies, Cardiomyopathy, Congenital atrioventricular block, Heart block, Taverne, General Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal Article
Citation
Van den Berg, N W E, Slieker, M G, van Beynum, I M, Bilardo, C M, de Bruijn, D, Clur, S A, Cornette, J M J, Frohn-Mulder, I M E, Haak, M C, van Loo-Maurus, K E H, Manten, G T R, Rackowitz, A B M H, Rammeloo, L A J, Reimer, A, Rijlaarsdam, M E B & Freund, M W 2016, 'Fluorinated steroids do not improve outcome of isolated atrioventricular block', International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 225, pp. 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.119