Correction: How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
Publication date
2025
Authors
van den Akker, Olmo R
Wicherts, Jelte M
Alvarez, Linda Dominguez
Bakker, Marjan
van Assen, Marcel A. L. M.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Comment
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
In the abstract of this paper, in the last sentence, the word overestimate should have been underestimate. So the correct final sentence of the abstract is: “Our studies demonstrate that many psychology researchers underestimate the evidence in favor of a theory if one or more results from a set of replication studies are statistically significant, highlighting the need for better statistical education.”
Keywords
Citation
van den Akker, O R, Wicherts, J M, Alvarez, L D, Bakker, M & van Assen, M A L M 2025, 'Correction : How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?', Psychonomic bulletin & review, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2430. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02687-5