Implementation of conditional reimbursement schemes in HTA practice: Experiences from the Netherlands

Publication date

2016-11-01

Authors

Makady, A.A.M.A.ISNI 0000000443773580
Nijmeijer, H.
De Boer, AnthoniusISNI 0000000389596105
Hillege, J.L.
Klungel, Olaf H.ISNI 0000000390199414
Goettsch, W.G.ORCID 0000-0002-8022-7496ISNI 0000000395155859

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Abstract

License

Abstract

Objectives: In 2007, the National Healthcare Institute (ZIN) initiated conditional financing (CF) of expensive hospital drugs as an example of conditional reimbursement schemes (CRS). CF is a 4-year procedure encompassing initial HTA assessment (T= 0) followed by additional data collection via outcomes research (separately assessing appropriate use & cost effectiveness in routine practice) and re-assessment (T= 4). This study aims to review performance and experiences with CF in the Netherlands to date. Methods: All dossiers for drugs that underwent the full CF procedure were reviewed. Using a standardised data abstraction form, 2 researchers independently extracted information on procedural and methodological aspects (i.e. related to implemented outcomes research & evidence assessment). A scoring algorithm was used to assess both aspects. Results: Forty-seven candidates were nominated for CF; 44 underwent T= 0 assessments and 10 T= 4 assessments. The CF procedure extended beyond 4 years for 8 of the 10 candidates. For the 10 candidates, applicants clearly defined study designs and data collection methods for outcomes research proposals addressing 14 of 20 research questions posed in T= 0 reports. ZIN provided discussion points and recommendations regarding research proposals for 16 of 20 research questions. Applicants implemented recommendations fully in 2 cases and partially in 14. Sufficient data was available at T= 4 to answer 13 of 20 research questions posed at T= 0. However, discussion points remained regarding implemented outcomes research for all 10 candidates at T= 4. ZIN advised to continue reimbursement for 6 candidates and to stop reimbursement for 2. In 2 of the 6 candidates, reimbursement was continued on the condition of additional evidence generation beyond T= 4. Two candidates did not receive a final recommendation. Conclusions: Theoretically, CF provides a valuable option for enabling quick but conditional access to medicines in the Netherlands. However, procedural and methodological aspects related to scheme design and implementation may affect its value in decision-making practice.

Keywords

case report, decision making, financial management, human, information processing, Netherlands, outcomes research, reimbursement, scientist, study design

Citation

Makady, A, Nijmeijer, H, De Boer, A, Hillege, J L, Klungel, O & Goettsch, W 2016, 'Implementation of conditional reimbursement schemes in HTA practice: Experiences from the Netherlands', Value in Health, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. A348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.011