Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands
Publication date
2016
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of the MRSA Search and Destroy (S&D) policy between 2008 and 2013 in the Kennemer Gasthuis, a 400 bed teaching hospital in the region Kennemerland, the Netherlands. METHODS: A patient registration database was used to retrospectively calculate costs, including screening, isolation, follow-up, contact tracing, cleaning, treatment, deployment of extra healthcare workers, salary for an infection control practitioner (ICP) and service of isolation rooms. The estimated benefits (costs and lives when no MRSA S&D was applied) were based on a varying MRSA prevalence rate (up to 50%). RESULTS: When no MRSA S&D policy was applied, the additional costs and deaths due to MRSA bacteraemia were estimated to be € 1,388,907 and 33 respectively (at a MRSA prevalence rate of 50%). Currently, the total costs were estimated to be € 290,672 (€ 48,445 annually) and a MRSA prevalence rate of 17.3% was considered as break-even point. Between 2008 and 2013, a total of 576 high risk patients were screened for MRSA carriage, of whom 19 (3.3%) were found to be MRSA positive. Forty-nine patients (72.1%) were found unexpectedly. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the MRSA S&D policy saves lives and money, although the high rate of unexpected MRSA cases is alarming.
Keywords
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Economics, Hospital, Follow-Up Studies, Health Personnel, Humans, Mass Screening, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Netherlands, Patient Isolation, Risk, Staphylococcal Infections, Journal Article
Citation
Souverein, D, Houtman, P, Euser, S M, Herpers, B L, Kluytmans, J & Den Boer, J W 2016, 'Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands', PLoS ONE [E], vol. 11, no. 2, e0148175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148175