Log In

Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , Waldhober.pdf (478.85 KB)
How and where to find an Open Access version of this publication?

Publication date

2011

Authors

de Best-Waldhober, M.
Daamen, D.
Ramirez, AndreaISNI 0000000388171084
Faaij, AndréISNI 0000000397196996
Hendriks, C.
de Visser, Erika
Simöes, S.
Cabal, H.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

Document Type

Article

Metadata

Show full item record

Collections

Utrecht University Repository

License

Abstract

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n =971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options.

Keywords

Citation

de Best-Waldhober, M, Daamen, D, Ramírez Ramírez, C A, Faaij, A P C, Hendriks, C, de Visser, E, Simöes, S & Cabal, H 2011, 'Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options', Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4795-4802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

URI

https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/235243