Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations

Publication date

2019-07-01

Authors

Salden, Odette A
van den Broek, Hans T.
van Everdingen, WouterISNI 0000000464452962
Mohamed Hoesein, Firdaus AAISNI 0000000387296109
Velthuis, BirgittaORCID 0000-0002-2542-9474ISNI 0000000395231874
Doevendans, Pieter A.ISNI 0000000110574516
Cramer, Maarten J.ISNI 0000000390984527
Tuinenburg, Anton EISNI 0000000391500168
Leufkens, Paul
van Slochteren, Frebus JORCID 0000-0003-2657-7409

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-procedural visualization of optimal pacing sites and image-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In fifteen patients (10 males, 68 ± 11 years, 7 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ejection fraction of 26 ± 5%), optimal pacing sites were identified pre-procedurally using cardiac imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived scar and dyssynchrony maps were created for all patients. In six patients the anatomy of the left phrenic nerve (LPN) and coronary sinus ostium was assessed via a computed tomography (CT) scan. By overlaying the CMR and CT dataset onto live fluoroscopy, aforementioned structures were visualized during LV lead implantation. In the first nine patients, the platform was tested, yet, no real-time image-guidance was implemented. In the last six patients real-time image-guided LV lead placement was successfully executed. CRT implant and fluoroscopy times were similar to previous procedures and all leads were placed close to the target area but away from scarred myocardium and the LPN. Patients that received real-time image-guided LV lead implantation were paced closer to the target area compared to patients that did not receive real-time image-guidance (8 mm [IQR 0–22] vs 26 mm [IQR 17–46], p = 0.04), and displayed marked LV reverse remodeling at 6 months follow up with a mean LVESV change of −30 ± 10% and a mean LVEF improvement of 15 ± 5%. Real-time image-guided LV lead implantation is feasible and may prove useful for achieving the optimal LV lead position.

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Image fusion, Image-guided interventions, Multimodality imaging, Targeted lead placement, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Ventricular Function, Left, Humans, Middle Aged, Male, Equipment Design, Recovery of Function, Feasibility Studies, Ventricular Remodeling, Myocardial Ischemia/complications, Time Factors, Female, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Treatment Outcome, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Multimodal Imaging/methods, Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods, Radiography, Interventional/methods, Aged, Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

Salden, O A E, van den Broek, H T, van Everdingen, W M, Mohamed Hoesein, F A A, Velthuis, B K, Doevendans, P A, Cramer, M J, Tuinenburg, A E, Leufkens, P, van Slochteren, F J & Meine, M 2019, 'Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations', International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01574-0