Research breakdowns: A constructive critique of research practice involving grief, trauma and displaced people
Publication date
2024-05-09
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Impactful research on refugee mental health is urgently needed. To mitigate the growing refugee crisis, researchers and clinicians seek to better understand the relationship between trauma, grief and post-migration factors with the aim of bringing better awareness, more resources and improved support for these communities and individuals living in host countries. As much as this is our intention, the prevailing research methods, that is, online anonymous questionnaires, used to engage refugees in mental health research are increasingly outdated and lack inclusivity and representation. With this perspective piece, we would like to highlight a growing crisis in global mental health research; the predominance of a Global North-centric approach and methodology. We use our recent research challenges and breakdowns as a learning example and possible opportunity to rebuild our research practice in a more ethical and equitable way.
Keywords
decolonial approach, epistemic justice, global mental health, prolonged grief disorder, refugee and displaced peoples, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health Policy, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Citation
Killikelly, C, Comtesse, H, Lechner-Meichsner, F, Sam, J, Ogrodniczuk, J S, Killikelly, C & Killikelly, C 2024, 'Research breakdowns : A constructive critique of research practice involving grief, trauma and displaced people', Global Mental Health, vol. 11, e68. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.60