Staying, Leaving, or Returning? Conflict Resolution Preferences and Migration among Ukrainian Women

Publication date

2025

Authors

Kogan, Irena
Kosyakova, Yuliya
van Tubergen, FrankORCID 0000-0002-6415-2877ISNI 0000000383575215

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Little is known in the literature about non-economic factors that might shape migrant selectivity. This study examines how preferences for resolving the Russian-Ukrainian conflict relate to the migration patterns and intentions of Ukrainians following the Russian full-scale aggression. Drawing on the concepts of place utility and migration decision-making models, we analyse data from the OneUA survey, which was collected around six months after Russia’s full-scale invasion among almost 25,000 Ukrainian women residing in Ukraine and abroad. Our results, based on a series of logistic regressions, suggest that Ukrainian women favouring a military solution to the conflict are more likely to remain in their pre-war residence in Ukraine rather than being internally displaced (i.e., IDP) or moving abroad (i.e., refugees). Moreover, among women forced to leave the country as refugees those who favour a military solution, exhibit a stronger intention to return. Conversely, among women still in Ukraine, those who favour a military solution less are more likely to consider international migration. Our study advances research on self-selection into migration based on non-economic factors, emphasising the role of political perceptions in displacement and resettlement patterns in conflict-affected regions.

Keywords

internal displacement, migrant selectivity, migration intentions, political preferences, refugees, stayers, Ukraine, Sociology and Political Science, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

Kogan, I, Kosyakova, Y & van Tubergen, F 2025, 'Staying, Leaving, or Returning? Conflict Resolution Preferences and Migration among Ukrainian Women', Studies of Transition States and Societies, vol. 17, pp. 117-145. https://doi.org/10.58036/stss.v17i0.1336