Ras/MAPK Modifier Loci Revealed by eQTL in Caenorhabditis elegans

Publication date

2017-09-07

Authors

Sterken, Mark G
van Bemmelen van der Plaat, Linda
Riksen, Joost A G
Rodriguez, Miriam
Schmid, Tobias
Hajnal, Alex
Kammenga, Jan E
Snoek, BastenISNI 0000000419527486

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The oncogenic Ras/MAPK pathway is evolutionarily conserved across metazoans. Yet, almost all our knowledge on this pathway comes from studies using single genetic backgrounds, whereas mutational effects can be highly background dependent. Therefore, we lack insight in the interplay between genetic backgrounds and the Ras/MAPK-signaling pathway. Here, we used a Caenorhabditis elegans RIL population containing a gain-of-function mutation in the Ras/MAPK-pathway gene let-60 and measured how gene expression regulation is affected by this mutation. We mapped eQTL and found that the majority (∼73%) of the 1516 detected cis-eQTL were not specific for the let-60 mutation, whereas most (∼76%) of the 898 detected trans-eQTL were associated with the let-60 mutation. We detected six eQTL trans-bands specific for the interaction between the genetic background and the mutation, one of which colocalized with the polymorphic Ras/MAPK modifier amx-2 Comparison between transgenic lines expressing allelic variants of amx-2 showed the involvement of amx-2 in 79% of the trans-eQTL for genes mapping to this trans-band. Together, our results have revealed hidden loci affecting Ras/MAPK signaling using sensitized backgrounds in C. elegans These loci harbor putative polymorphic modifier genes that would not have been detected using mutant screens in single genetic backgrounds.

Keywords

Caenorhabditis elegans, RAS/MAPK, eQTL, genetic background

Citation

Sterken, M G, van Bemmelen van der Plaat, L, Riksen, J A G, Rodriguez, M, Schmid, T, Hajnal, A, Kammenga, J E & Snoek, B L 2017, 'Ras/MAPK Modifier Loci Revealed by eQTL in Caenorhabditis elegans', G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3185-3193. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.1120