Prompting for products: investigating design space exploration strategies for text-to-image generative models
Publication date
2025-01-15
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Text-to-image models are enabling efficient design space exploration, rapidly generating images from text prompts. However, many generative AI tools are imperfect for product design applications as they are not built for the goals and requirements of product design. The unclear link between text input and image output further complicates their application. This work empirically investigates design space exploration strategies that can successfully yield product images that are feasible, novel and aesthetic - three common goals in product design. Specifically, users' actions within the global and local editing modes, including their time spent, prompt length, mono versus multi-criteria prompts, and goal orientation of prompts, are analyzed. Key findings reveal the pivotal role of mono versus multi-criteria and goal orientation of prompts in achieving specific design goals over time and prompt length. The study recommends prioritizing the use of multi-criteria prompts for feasibility and novelty during global editing while favoring mono-criteria prompts for aesthetics during local editing. Overall, this article underscores the nuanced relationship between the AI-driven text-to-image models and their effectiveness in product design, urging designers to carefully structure prompts during different editing modes to better meet the unique demands of product design.
Keywords
design space exploration, product design, prompt engineering, text-to-image generative AI, Modelling and Simulation, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, General Engineering
Citation
Chong, L, Lo, I P, Rayan, J, Dow, S, Ahmed, F & Lykourentzou, I 2025, 'Prompting for products : investigating design space exploration strategies for text-to-image generative models', Design Science, vol. 11, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2024.51