Using equity theory to examine the differences between burnout and depression

Publication date

2000

Authors

Bakker, A.ISNI 0000000492917034
Schaufeli, WilmarORCID 0000-0002-6070-7150ISNI 0000000081817266
Demerouti, EvaISNI 0000000078631081
Janssen, PPM
Van der Hulst, R
Brouwer, J

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

This study among a sample of 154 Dutch teachers examines the discriminant validity of burnout and depression, as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), respectively. Confirmatory factor analyses show that burnout can be statistically discriminated from depression. Results corroborate the three-factor structure of the MBI and partly confirm the four-factor structure of the CES-D. Furthermore, results of structural equation modeling analyses show that a lack of reciprocity in the relationship with one's partner predicts depression (and not burnout), and that a lack of reciprocity in the relationship with students predicts burnout (and only indirectly depression). These findings are consistent with equity theory, and confirm the central hypothesis that burnout is work-related, whereas depression is context-free.

Keywords

Burnout, Depression, Reciprocity, Teacher, Taverne, International

Citation

Bakker, AB, Schaufeli, WB, Demerouti, E, Janssen, PPM, Van der Hulst, R & Brouwer, J 2000, 'Using equity theory to examine the differences between burnout and depression', Anxiety, Stress, and Coping : an International Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800008549265