It’s not all about the money—landowner motivation and high voltage grid development

Publication date

2023

Authors

Koelman, Mark
Hartmann, Thomas
Spit, T.J.M.ISNI 000000011050872X

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

The transition to a renewable energy future requires the extensive expansion of current high voltage grids. Due to the amount of land needed for expansion, issues related to land use have led to increased grid development opposition among landowners which in turn leads to significant project planning and budget overruns. Yet knowledge about why landowners support or object to high voltage grid development is limited. In this study, we use a theory on pluralism to uncover and categorize the multiplicity of motivations of 200 individual landowners in the Netherlands. Our results indicate that only a small number of landowners who oppose grid development focus on individual monetary gain through compensation for limits on their land use. Furthermore, most landowners find the fair and equal distribution of both the advantages and disadvantages of such limits more important than individual financial compensation. As such, overcoming contentious land use issues related to high voltage grid development by way of high individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution. Highlights: Land use conflicts affect expansions of high voltage grids crucial for meeting CO2 objectives Motivations of landowners are unevenly divided among different rationalities Most individual landowners do support high voltage grid developments Individual financial compensation isn’t the only solution.

Keywords

egalitarianism, high voltage grid development, Land use conflicts, landowner motivation, rationalities, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy

Citation

Koelman, M, Hartmann, T & Spit, T J M 2023, 'It’s not all about the money—landowner motivation and high voltage grid development', Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2093175