An analysis of different strategies for the prioritization of groundwater quality prediction studies with a sequential numerical game
Publication date
2006
Authors
Vink, K.
Schot, P.P.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Groundwater quality prediction studies are carried out to increase
the reaction time when drinking water companies have to respond to
breakthroughs of contaminants. Drinking water companies exploit numerous
wells and need to decide on research priorities for these wells, as budgets are
limited. The reliability and accuracy of predictions improve if more funds are
invested in data-collection and prediction studies, but there is no clear decision
model available to determine the required level of (un)certainty. Hence, it is
unclear which prioritization strategy is optimal. Unnecessary losses can occur
if inappropriate strategies are followed. A decision analysis of strategies for
prioritizing prediction studies is presented in this paper, where the problem is
posed as an optimization problem with an explicit loss function. A sequential
numerical game was set up in order to assess the effectiveness of different
strategies. There were significant differences between the performances of
strategies. The most successful strategy used the anticipated uncertainty
reduction of additional studies as one of the prioritization criteria and takes the
uncertainty of predictions in to account.
Keywords
decision making under uncertainty, groundwater quality, groundwater transport, system operation and management