Limits in detecting acceleration of ice sheet mass loss due to climate variability

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , ngeo1874.pdf (407.01 KB)

Publication date

2013

Authors

Wouters, B.ISNI 0000000080129605
Bamber, J.L.
van den Broeke, MichielORCID 0000-0003-4662-7565ISNI 0000000389564445
Lenaerts, J.T.M.ISNI 0000000419442044
Sasgen, I.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been reported to be losing mass at accelerating rates1, 2. If sustained, this accelerating mass loss will result in a global mean sea-level rise by the year 2100 that is approximately 43 cm greater than if a linear trend is assumed2. However, at present there is no scientific consensus on whether these reported accelerations result from variability inherent to the ice-sheet–climate system, or reflect long-term changes and thus permit extrapolation to the future3. Here we compare mass loss trends and accelerations in satellite data collected between January 2003 and September 2012 from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment to long-term mass balance time series from a regional surface mass balance model forced by re-analysis data. We find that the record length of spaceborne gravity observations is too short at present to meaningfully separate long-term accelerations from short-term ice sheet variability. We also find that the detection threshold of mass loss acceleration depends on record length: to detect an acceleration at an accuracy within ±10 Gt yr−2, a period of 10 years or more of observations is required for Antarctica and about 20 years for Greenland. Therefore, climate variability adds uncertainty to extrapolations of future mass loss and sea-level rise, underscoring the need for continuous long-term satellite monitoring.

Keywords

SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Wouters, B, Bamber, J L, van den Broeke, M R, Lenaerts, J T M & Sasgen, I 2013, 'Limits in detecting acceleration of ice sheet mass loss due to climate variability', Nature Geoscience, vol. 6, pp. 613-616. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1874