Temporal shifts in clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms of atherosclerotic disease

Publication date

2017-01

Authors

Pasterkamp, GerardISNI 0000000397161080
den Ruijter, Hester M.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-014XISNI 0000000392927067
Libby, Peter

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

The concept of the 'vulnerable plaque' originated from pathological observations in patients who died from acute coronary syndrome. This recognition spawned a generation of research that led to greater understanding of how complicated atherosclerotic plaques form and precipitate thrombotic events. In current practice, an increasing number of patients who survive their first event present with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) rather than myocardial infarction (MI) with ST-segment elevation (STEMI). The culprit lesions that provide the pathological substrate for NSTEMI can vary considerably from the so-called 'vulnerable plaque'. The shift in clinical presentation of MI and stroke corresponds temporally to a progressive change in the characteristics of human plaques away from the supposed characteristics of vulnerability. These alterations in the structure and function of human atherosclerotic lesions might mirror the modifications that are produced in experimental plaques by lipid lowering, inspired by the vulnerable plaque construct. The shift in the clinical presentations of the acute coronary syndromes mandates a critical reassessment of the underlying mechanisms, proposed risk scores, the results and interpretation of preclinical experiments, as well as recognition of the limitations of the use of population data and samples collected before the application of current preventive interventions.

Keywords

Taverne, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Review, Journal Article

Citation

Pasterkamp, G, den Ruijter, H M & Libby, P 2017, 'Temporal shifts in clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms of atherosclerotic disease', Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.166