Outcomes of eight cats with oral neoplasia treated with radical mandibulectomy

Publication date

2020-01

Authors

Boston, Sarah E
van Stee, LucindaORCID 0000-0002-0680-9690ISNI 000000049296077X
Bacon, Nicholas J
Szentimrey, David
Kirby, Barbara M
van Nimwegen, BasORCID 0000-0002-5366-0120ISNI 000000041949192X
Wavreille, Vincent A

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes after radical mandibulectomy in cats. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institutional retrospective study. ANIMALS: Eight cats were included. METHODS: Medical records were searched for cats with confirmed oral neoplasia treated with radical mandibulectomy. Data collected included demographics, surgical procedure, histopathological diagnosis, postoperative management, and outcomes. RESULTS: Ages ranged from 8 to 17 years. All cats had 75% to 90% of the mandible removed and feeding tubes placed. Seven cats had squamous cell carcinoma, and one cat had a giant cell tumor. Six cats ate on their own postoperatively. Three cats had local recurrence and tumor-related died at 136 and 291 days. Six cats had no recurrence, with survival times of 156, 465, 608, and 1023 days, and two cats were still alive at 316 and 461 days after surgery. The three long-term survivors died of causes unrelated to oral neoplasia. One cat died at 156 days due to aspiration of food material. The overall estimated mean survival time was 712 days. CONCLUSION: After radical mandibulectomy, independent food intake was achieved in 6 of eight cats, and four cats lived longer than one year. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Radical mandibulectomy should be considered for the treatment of extensive oral neoplasia in cats. Successful long-term outcomes are possible with aggressive supportive care perioperatively.

Keywords

Taverne

Citation

Boston, S E, van Stee, L L, Bacon, N J, Szentimrey, D, Kirby, B M, van Nimwegen, S & Wavreille, V A 2020, 'Outcomes of eight cats with oral neoplasia treated with radical mandibulectomy', Veterinary Surgery, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13341