Conclusions: LCI Revisited

Publication date

2017

Authors

Bennister, Mark
t Hart, PaulISNI 0000000110288923
Worthy, Benjamin

Editors

bennister, mark
't hart, paul
worthy, benjamin

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This concluding chapter reflects on how the LCI has performed and how it can be developed. Application of the LCI is analyzed across different leadership puzzles and contexts and for what this tells us about the authority of political leaders. Some interpretations of capital fluctuation across the chapters are presented. The LCI allows exploration of how skills, relations, and reputations create, build, or erode authority. Questions remain over the weighting of indicators, the balance between hard and soft measurements, and broader questions about how capital is acquired, preserved, and, in rare cases, regained. Leaders in weakly democratic systems may be less prone to “normal” patterns of capital fluctuation. Overall, the LCI does allow students of political leadership to think about the difference between political office-holding and exercising political leadership, and about why and when some leaders are able to make the political weather rather than being swept along by it.

Keywords

leadership, measurement, patterns, comparison, political leadership, capital, LCI, Coronacrisis-Taverne

Citation

Bennister, M, t Hart, P & Worthy, B 2017, Conclusions : LCI Revisited. in M bennister, P 't hart & B worthy (eds), The Leadership Capital Index: A New Perspective on Political Ledership. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198783848.003.0015