Do universities have moral duties with regard to a human right to health?: In defense of some proposals by UAEM (Universities Allied for Essential Medicines)
Files
Publication date
2018
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This article argues that universities have duties to negotiate contracts with the pharmaceutical industry that are favourable to the world’s poor, and to do more research into diseases which disproportionately strike the global poor. It is argued that these duties are related to human rights (in particular to a human right to health) and that they are therefore very weighty. Furthermore, these duties are in line with some of the most important things that Universities Allied for Essential Medicines (UAEM), a worldwide group of students and academics, wants universities to do. A number of objections are discussed, among other things to do with safeguarding pharmaceutical innovation, and it is argued that the aforementioned duties should, as UAEM also advocates, often be combined with efforts on the part of universities to work towards more long-term, large-scale institutional arrangements to ensure access to and availability of essential medicines for the global poor.
Keywords
moral duties of universities, essential medicines, human rights, human right to health, ethics/moralphilosophy, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Philips, J P M 2018, 'Do universities have moral duties with regard to a human right to health? In defense of some proposals by UAEM (Universities Allied for Essential Medicines)', Ethics and Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43-65. < http://hdl.handle.net/1866/19817 >