Public service motivation and individual job performance

Publication date

2021

Authors

Ritz, Adrian
Vandenabeele, W.V.ISNI 0000000396776761
Vogel, Dominik

Editors

Leisink, Peter
Andersen, Lotte B.
Brewer, Gene A.
Jacobsen, Christian B.
Knies, Eva
Vandenabeele, Wouter

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

When pressure on human resource departments to make government more efficient is increasing, it is of great relevance to understand employees’ motivation and the fit of an employee with their job, as both contribute strongly to service performance. Therefore, this chapter discusses the role of public employees’ motivation and its relationship to individual performance. More specifically, this relationship is examined by focusing on public service motivation (PSM), a stream of research developed during the last three decades stressing the service orientation of public employees’ identity. Theoretically, how the relationship between PSM and individual performance is dependent on institutions is discussed, and an overview of the existing empirical evidence concerning this relationship is provided. The literature review discusses a variety of aspects such as direct vs. indirect effects, type of performance used, how performance is measured, and effect sizes. Finally, several avenues for future research are proposed, including methodological strategies.

Keywords

Human resource management, Individual performance, Job performance, Performance, Public employee, Public sector motivation, Public service identity, Public service motivation, Public service performance, Taverne, Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all), General Business,Management and Accounting, General Social Sciences

Citation

Ritz, A, Vandenabeele, W & Vogel, D 2021, Public service motivation and individual job performance. in P Leisink, L B Andersen, G A Brewer, C B Jacobsen, E Knies & W Vandenabeele (eds), Managing for public service performance : How people and values make a difference. Oxford University Press, pp. 254-277. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0014