Estimated clinical benefit of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional flank irradiation in pediatric renal tumors

Publication date

2021-07

Authors

Mul, Joeri
Seravalli, EnricaORCID 0000-0001-5983-2256ISNI 0000000047208248
Bosman, Mirjam E.
van de Ven, C. P.ISNI 0000000396451078
Littooij, AnnemiekeISNI 0000000390317062
van Grotel, MartineISNI 0000000388228167
van den Heuvel-Eibrink, MarryISNI 0000000394733717
Janssens, Geert OORCID 0000-0002-0331-713X

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background: For decades, Anterior-Posterior/Posterior-Anterior (AP/PA) photon beams were standard-of-care for flank irradiation in children with renal cancer. Recently, highly conformal flank target volumes were defined correcting for postoperative organ shift and intra-fraction motion.By radiotherapy treatment plan comparison, this study aims to estimate the clinical benefits and potential risks of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional target volumes with AP/PA beams for flank irradiation. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive renal tumor cases (left/right-sided:10/10; median age:3.2 years) were selected. Highly conformal flank target volumes were generated for VMAT, while conventional target volumes were used for AP/PA. For each case, the dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and Total Body Volume (TBV) was calculated to compare VMAT with AP/PA treatment plans for a prescribed dose (PD) of 14.4/1.8 Gy. Dose constraint violation of the tail of the pancreas and spleen (D mean < 10 Gy), heart (D 50 < 5 Gy) or mammary buds (D mean < 10 Gy) were prioritized as potentially beneficial for clinics. Results: Highly conformal Planning Target Volumes (PTV) were smaller than conventional volumes (mean ΔPTV AP/PA-PTV VMAT: 555 mL, Δ60%, p=<0.01). A mean dose reduction favoring VMAT was observed for almost all OARs. Dose constraints to the tail of the pancreas, spleen, heart and mammary buds were fulfilled in 8/20, 12/20, 16/20 and 19/20 cases with AP/PA, versus 14/20, 17/20, 20/20 and 20/20 cases with VMAT, respectively. In 12/20 cases, VMAT prevented the dose constraint violation of one or more OARs otherwise exceeded by AP/PA. VMAT increased the TBV receiving 10% of the PD, but reduced the amount of irradiated TBV for all higher doses. Conclusion: Compared to 14.4 Gy flank irradiation using conventional AP/PA photon beams, an estimated clinical benefit by dose reduction to the OARs can be expected in 60% of the pediatric renal tumor cases using highly conformal flank target volumes combined with VMAT.

Keywords

Conformal radiotherapy, Organs at risk, Pediatric renal tumors, Side-effects, VMAT, Wilms tumor, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

Mul, J, Seravalli, E, Bosman, M E, van de Ven, C P, Littooij, A S, van Grotel, M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M M & Janssens, G O 2021, 'Estimated clinical benefit of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional flank irradiation in pediatric renal tumors', Clinical and translational radiation oncology, vol. 29, pp. 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.007