Licence to Pollute? Revisiting the Regulatory Compliance Defence in Civil Proceedings in Cases of Human Rights Violations
Files
Publication date
2025-07-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
There are various examples of industrial activities carried out in compliance with public regulation or permits that result in harm to human health and the environment. In several legal systems, regulatory compliance may have a safeguarding effect in civil proceedings, often preventing civil law from providing legal protection against the harmful consequences of industrial activities. This article discusses under which circumstances such a safeguarding effect of regulatory compliance is untenable when human rights are at stake. It argues that Articles 2 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights influence the civil liability of operators and limit regulatory compliance as a defence in private law litigation.
Keywords
environmental and health damage, European Convention on Human Rights, human rights, regulatory compliance defence, tort law, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Law, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Stalenhoef, C, de Jong, E & Faure, M 2025, 'Licence to Pollute? Revisiting the Regulatory Compliance Defence in Civil Proceedings in Cases of Human Rights Violations', Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqaf013