The sustainable start-up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start-ups

Publication date

2021-02

Authors

Leendertse, JipORCID 0000-0002-4873-8173ISNI 0000000492796180
van Rijnsoever, F.J.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-2792ISNI 0000000137667261
Eveleens, C.P.ISNI 0000000419569002

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Sustainable start-ups introduce new sustainable technologies and business models that facilitate the transition to a carbon neutral economy. To understand how to create viable sustainable start-ups, we study what factors predict their business performance and climate performance (i.e., the ability of the start-up to reduce CO 2 equivalent [CO 2e] emissions) and if these contradict. A critical factor we consider is technology, which is commonly at the root of climate performance, and important for business performance because it influences a start-up's competitive advantage. Using a sample of 197 sustainable start-ups, we find a paradox between business and potential climate performance. Start-ups that exploit hardware technologies have a lower business performance but a higher potential climate performance. Through the use of mediating effects, we show that the sustainable start-up paradox is context specific. Start-ups can partly escape this paradox by focusing on novel and hardware technologies. We discuss implications for theory and practice.

Keywords

business performance, climate performance, environment, environmental entrepreneurship, start-ups, sustainability transition, sustainable entrepreneurship, technology, Business and International Management, Geography, Planning and Development, Strategy and Management, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Leendertse, J, van Rijnsoever, F J & Eveleens, C P 2021, 'The sustainable start-up paradox: Predicting the business and climate performance of start-ups', Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2667