Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre-recycling
Publication date
2010
Authors
Shen, L.
Worrell, E.
Patel, M.K.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This study assesses the environmental impact of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle-to-fibre recycling
using the methodology of life-cycle assessment (LCA). Four recycling cases, including mechanical
recycling, semi-mechanical recycling, back-to-oligomer recycling and back-to-monomer recycling were
analysed. Three allocation methods are applied for open-loop recycling, i.e. the “cut-off” approach, the
“waste valuation” approach and the “system expansion” approach. Nine environmental impact indicators
were analysed, i.e. non-renewable energy use (NREU), global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion,
acidification, eutrophication, human toxicity, fresh water aquatic ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity and
photochemical oxidant formation. The LCA results are compared with virgin PET fibre and other commodity
fibre products, i.e. cotton, viscose, PP (polypropylene) and PLA (polylactic acid). The LCA results
show that recycled PET fibres offer important environmental benefits over virgin PET fibre. Depending
on the allocation methods applied for open-loop-recycling, NREU savings of 40–85% and GWP savings of
25–75% can be achieved. Recycled PET fibres produced by mechanical recycling cause lower environmental
impacts than virgin PET in at least eight out of a total of nine categories. Recycled fibres produced from
chemical recycling allow to reduce impacts in six to seven out of a total of nine categories compared to
virgin PET fibres. Note that while mechanical recycling has a better environmental profile than chemical
recycling, chemically recycled fibres can be applied in a wider range of applications than mechanically
recycled fibres.