Conclusions
Publication date
2021
Authors
Dignum, Frank
Vanhée, Loïs
Jensen, Maarten
Kammler, Christian
Mellema, René
Lorig, Fabian
Păstrăv, Cezara
van den Hurk, Mijke
Melchior, Alexander
Ghorbani, Amineh
Editors
Dignum, Frank
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
We finish the book with a chapter in which we describe what we decided not to do or include in the ASSOCC framework. Where did we stop? And why did we stop? The temptation is to keep adding more and more aspects in order to simulate more scenarios. However, at the same time the simulation would become more complex and unmanageable. We also summarise what we have learned from all the different parts of our experience. And most importantly we give a roadmap of research that would be needed to make social simulations a standard tool to be used for crisis situations.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Dignum, F, Vanhée, L, Jensen, M, Kammler, C, Mellema, R, Lorig, F, Păstrăv, C, Hurk, M V D, Melchior, A, Ghorbani, A, Bruin, B D, Kreulen, K, Verhagen, H & Davidsson, P 2021, Conclusions. in F Dignum (ed.), Social Simulation for a Crisis : Results and Lessons from Simulating the COVID-19 Crisis. 1 edn, Computational Social Sciences, Springer, pp. 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76397-8_16