Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients
Publication date
2024-11
Authors
Liegl, Gregor
Fischer, Felix H
Canaud, Bernard
Woodward, Mark
Barth, Claudia
Davenport, Andrew
Török, Marietta
Strippoli, Giovanni F M
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Cromm, Krister
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
PURPOSE: We applied a previously established common T-score metric for patient-reported and performance-based physical function (PF), offering the unique opportunity to directly compare measurement type-specific patterns of associations with potential laboratory-based, psychosocial, sociodemographic, and health-related determinants in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from the CONVINCE trial (N = 1,360), a multinational randomized controlled trial comparing high-flux hemodialysis with high-dose hemodiafiltration. To explore the associations of potential determinants with performance-based versus patient-reported PF, we conducted multiple linear regression (backward elimination with cross-validation and Lasso regression). We used standardized T-scores as estimated from the PROMIS PF short-form 4a (patient-reported PF) and the Physical Performance Test (performance-based PF) as dependent variables. RESULTS: Performance-based and patient-reported PF were both significantly associated with a laboratory marker-based indicator of muscle mass (simplified creatinine index), although the effects were relatively small (partial f 2 = 0.04). Age was negatively associated with PF; the effect size was larger for performance-based (partial f 2 = 0.12) than for patient-reported PF (partial f 2 = 0.08). Compared to performance-based PF, patient-reported PF showed a stronger association with self-reported health domains, particularly pain interference and fatigue. When using the individual difference between patient-reported and performance-based T-scores as outcome, we found that younger age and more fatigue were associated with lower patient-reported PF compared to performance-based PF (small effect size). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported and performance-based assessments were similarly associated with an objective marker of physical impairment in hemodialysis patients. Age and fatigue may result in discrepancies when comparing performance-based and patient-reported scores on the common PF scale. Trial Registration CONVINCE is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (Register ID: NL64750.041.18). The registration can be accessed at: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/52958 .
Keywords
Assessment, Common metric, Hemodialysis, Patient-reported outcomes, Performance outcomes, Physical function, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citation
Liegl, G, Fischer, F H, Canaud, B, Woodward, M, Barth, C, Davenport, A, Török, M, Strippoli, G F M, Hegbrant, J, Cromm, K, Bots, M L, Blankestijn, P J, Fischer, K I, Rose, M & CONVINCE scientific committee 2024, 'Using a measurement type-independent metric to compare patterns of determinants between patient-reported versus performance-based physical function in hemodialysis patients', Quality of Life Research, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2987-3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03745-6