The applicability and utilization of systematic reviews for clinical practice
Publication date
2022-10-24
Authors
Lindsley, Kristina Boyd
Editors
Advisors
Hooft, L.
Scholten, R.J.P.M.
Li, T.
Supervisors
Document Type
Dissertation
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
The aims of this thesis are to examine the applicability and utilization of systematic reviews in health care, and to identify barriers and provide insights for integrating systematic reviews more effectively into clinical practice in order to positively affect the health of patients. For the purposes of this thesis, applicability refers to whether a systematic review is relevant or appropriate for clinical decision-making. Utilization is defined as the actual use of systematic reviews in practice. The first part of this thesis assesses the extent to which systematic reviews are being used to inform clinical practice guidelines (Chapter 2). Subsequent chapters investigate specific challenges and potential solutions for incorporating systematic reviews, or evidence synthesis research generally, into health care decision-making (Chapters 3-7). The final chapter summarizes the work presented in this thesis and provides implications for practice and research (Chapter 8).
Keywords
Systematic review; Evidence synthesis; Clinical practice guidelines; Evidence-based medicine; Patient-important outcomes; Ophthalmology; Clinical trial registration; Risk of bias; Meta-analysis; Priority setting