Pragmatic randomized trials in drug development pose new ethical questions: A systematic review

Publication date

2015-07

Authors

Kalkman, Shona
van Thiel, Ghislaine J.M.W.ORCID 0000-0003-1799-1894ISNI 000000039033919X
Grobbee, RickORCID 0000-0003-4472-4468ISNI 0000000030206553
van Delden, Johannes J MISNI 000000002992622X

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Implementation of pragmatic design elements in drug development could bridge the evidence gap that currently exists between the knowledge we have regarding the efficacy of a drug versus its true, comparative effectiveness in real life. We performed a review of the literature to identify the ethical challenges thus far related to pragmatic trials. The three central ethical questions identified for pragmatic trials are: (i) what level of oversight should pragmatic trials require; (ii) do randomized patients face additional risks; and (iii) is a waiver of informed consent ethically defensible? Despite the fact all reviewed publications dealt with post-launch pragmatic trials, these results could serve as an important starting point for conceptualizing which challenges could potentially arise in the pre-launch setting.

Keywords

Taverne, Drug Discovery, Pharmacology, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review

Citation

Kalkman, S, van Thiel, G J M W, Grobbee, DE & van Delden, J J M 2015, 'Pragmatic randomized trials in drug development pose new ethical questions : A systematic review', Drug Discovery Today, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 856–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.03.005