Social contact and encounter in asylum seeker reception: the Utrecht Refugee Launchpad

Publication date

2020

Authors

Oliver, C.J.
Geuijen, C.H.M.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-5951ISNI 0000000009224925
Dekker, R.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-4223ISNI 0000000419578590

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The Utrecht Refugee Launchpad was an experiment at city-level to create a more inclusive form of asylum seeker reception. The initiative used co-housing, bringing together young, local tenants with asylum seekers to improve social integration and local relations. This article examines the nature of social contact, and considers the value of relationships developed between asylum seekers and tenants, using qualitative data from interviews and participant observation. Our findings demonstrate the importance of context, as we show that the remote logics of the national asylum system imposed spatial and temporal limitations on the co-housing model to generate ‘adjacent’ and transient living. However, at times –through both accident and design– contact was developed with more ease: when there was an equal ratio, similarities between populations, low numbers (of around eighty people in total), access to shared space, and high commitment to the project’s ‘disposition to friendliness’. While we conclude that relationships proved ephemeral rather than sustained, the initiative nevertheless held promise by enabling asylum seekers brief escapes from landscapes of indifference encountered during reception. Recognising how wider institutional contexts impact on the development of contact however helps innovations like these to achieve a greater potential for transforming relationships and values in urban space.

Keywords

Asylum seeker reception, Encounter, Co-housing, Local turn, Refugees, Social Contact, SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities

Citation

Oliver, C J, Geuijen, C H M & Dekker, R 2020, 'Social contact and encounter in asylum seeker reception : the Utrecht Refugee Launchpad', Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 8, 27, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00187-0