Prospective Evaluation of In Vivo and Phantom Repeatability and Reproducibility of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Sequences on 1.5T MRI-Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) and MR Simulator Devices for Head and Neck Cancers

Publication date

2023-08

Authors

McDonald, Brigid A
Salzillo, Travis
Mulder, Samuel
Ahmed, Sara
Dresner, Alex
Preston, Kathryn
He, Renjie
Christodouleas, John
S R Mohamed, Abdallah
Philippens, Marielle E PORCID 0000-0003-0205-3459ISNI 0000000387302804

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on MRI-linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems can potentially be used for monitoring treatment response and adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancers (HNC) but requires extensive validation. We performed technical validation to compare six total DWI sequences on an MR-linac and MR simulator (MR sim) in patients, volunteers, and phantoms. METHODS: Ten human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients and ten healthy volunteers underwent DWI on a 1.5T MR-linac with three DWI sequences: echo planar imaging (EPI), split acquisition of fast spin echo signals (SPLICE), and turbo spin echo (TSE). Volunteers were also imaged on a 1.5T MR sim with three sequences: EPI, BLADE (vendor tradename), and readout segmentation of long variable echo trains (RESOLVE). Participants underwent two scan sessions per device and two repeats of each sequence per session. Repeatability and reproducibility within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) of mean ADC were calculated for tumors and lymph nodes (patients) and parotid glands (volunteers). ADC bias, repeatability/reproducibility metrics, SNR, and geometric distortion were quantified using a phantom. RESULTS: In vivo repeatability/reproducibility wCV for parotids were 5.41%/6.72%, 3.83%/8.80%, 5.66%/10.03%, 3.44%/5.70%, 5.04%/5.66%, 4.23%/7.36% for EPI MR-linac, SPLICE, TSE, EPI MR sim, BLADE, RESOLVE. Repeatability/reproducibility wCV for EPI MR-linac, SPLICE, TSE were 9.64%/10.28%, 7.84%/8.96%, 7.60%/11.68% for tumors and 7.80%/9.95%, 7.23%/8.48%, 10.82%/10.44% for nodes. All sequences except TSE had phantom ADC biases within ±0.1x10 -3 mm 2/s for most vials (EPI MR-linac, SPLICE, and BLADE had 2, 3, and 1 vials out of 13 with larger biases, respectively). SNR of b=0 images was 87.3, 180.5, 161.3, 171.0, 171.9, 130.2 for EPI MR-linac, SPLICE, TSE, EPI MR sim, BLADE, RESOLVE. CONCLUSION: MR-linac DWI sequences demonstrated near-comparable performance to MR sim sequences and warrant further clinical validation for treatment response assessment in HNC.

Keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging, MR-guided radiation therapy, MR-Linac, Repeatability and reproducibility, Test-retest, Hematology, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

McDonald, B A, Salzillo, T, Mulder, S, Ahmed, S, Dresner, A, Preston, K, He, R, Christodouleas, J, S R Mohamed, A, Philippens, M, van Houdt, P, Thorwarth, D, Wang, J, Shukla Dave, A, Boss, M & Fuller, C D 2023, 'Prospective Evaluation of In Vivo and Phantom Repeatability and Reproducibility of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Sequences on 1.5T MRI-Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) and MR Simulator Devices for Head and Neck Cancers', Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 185, 109717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109717