Resource contrast in patterned peatlands increases along a climatic gradient
Publication date
2010
Authors
Eppinga, M.B.
Rietkerk, M.G.
Belyea, L.R.
Nilsson, M.B.
Ruiter, P.C. de
Wassen, M.J.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Copyright by the Ecological Society of America
Abstract
Spatial patterning of ecosystems can be explained by several mechanisms. One
approach to disentangling the influence of these mechanisms is to study a patterned ecosystem
along a gradient of environmental conditions. This study focused on hummock–hollow
patterning of peatlands. Previous models predicted that patterning in drainage-dominated
peatlands is driven by a peat-accumulation mechanism, reflected by higher nutrient
availability in hollows relative to hummocks. Alternatively, patterning in evapotranspiration
(ET)-dominated peatlands may be driven by a nutrient-accumulation mechanism, reflected by
reversed nutrient distribution, namely, higher nutrient availability in hummocks relative to
hollows. Here, we tested these predictions by comparing nutrient distributions among
patterned peatlands in maritime (Scotland), humid temperate (Sweden), and humid
continental (Siberia) climates. The areas comprise a climatic gradient from very wet and
drainage-dominated (Scotland) to less wet and ET-dominated (Siberia) peatlands. Nutrient
distribution was quantified as resource contrast, a measure for hummock–hollow difference in
nutrient availability. We tested the hypothesis that the climatic gradient shows a trend in the
resource contrast; from negative (highest nutrient availability in hollows) in Scotland to
positive (highest nutrient availability in hummocks) in Siberia. The resource contrasts as
measured in vegetation indeed showed a trend along the climatic gradient: contrasts were
negative to slightly positive in Scotland, positive in Sweden, and strongly positive in Siberia.
This finding corroborates the main prediction of previous models. Our results, however, also
provided indications for further model development. The low concentrations of nutrients in
the water suggest that existing models could be improved by considering both the dissolved
and adsorbed phase and explicit inclusion of both nutrient-uptake and nutrient-storage
processes. Our study suggests that future climate change may affect the ecosystem functioning
of patterned peatlands by altering the contribution of pattern-forming mechanisms to
redistribution of water and nutrients within these systems.
Keywords
empirical test, evapotranspiration, hummock–hollow pattern, model predictions, patterned peatlands, resource contrast