Students’ interaction with and appreciation of automated informative tutoring feedback

Publication date

2026-01-01

Authors

van der Hoek, GerbenISNI 0000000389584462
Heeren, Bastiaan
Bos, RogierORCID 0000-0003-2017-9792ISNI 0000000392098502
Drijvers, P.H.M.ISNI 0000000369715867
Jeuring, J.T.ISNI 0000000110063265

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Computer-aided formative assessment can be used to enhance a learning process, for instance, by providing feedback. There are many design choices for delivering feedback that lead to a feedback strategy. In an informative feedback strategy, students do not immediately receive information about the correct response but are offered the opportunity to retry a task to apply feedback information. In this small-scale qualitative study, we explore an informative feedback strategy designed to offer a balance between room for exploration and mitigation of learning barriers. The research questions concern the ways in which students interact with the feedback strategy and their appreciation of error-specific feedback as opposed to worked-out solutions. To answer these questions, 25 15- to 17-year-old senior general secondary education students worked for approximately 20 minutes on linear and exponential extrapolation tasks in an online environment. Data included screen captures of students working with the environment and post-intervention interviews. Results showed that room for exploration offered opportunities for self-guidance, while mitigation of learning barriers prevented disengagement. Furthermore, students appreciated balanced feedback. We conclude that the balanced feedback strategy yielded fruitful student–environment interactions.

Keywords

General Social Sciences, General Mathematics

Citation

van der Hoek, G, Heeren, B, Bos, R, Drijvers, P & Jeuring, J 2026, Students’ interaction with and appreciation of automated informative tutoring feedback. in Digital Technology and Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education Assessment. Taylor and Francis, pp. 186-206. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003533764-11