Predicted and actual 2-year structural and pain progression in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort

Publication date

2023-01-01

Authors

van Helvoort, Eefje M.
Jansen, Mylène P.ORCID 0000-0003-1929-6350
Marijnissen, Anne C AISNI 0000000391205580
Kloppenburg, Margreet
Blanco, Francisco J
Haugen, Ida K
Berenbaum, Francis
Bay-Jensen, Anne-Christine C
Ladel, Christoph
Lalande, Agnes

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis study used machine learning (ML) to predict structural and/or pain progression, expressed by a structural (S) and pain (P) predicted-progression score, to select patients from existing cohorts. This study evaluates the actual 2-year progression within the IMI-APPROACH, in relation to the predicted-progression scores. METHODS: Actual structural progression was measured using minimum joint space width (minJSW). Actual pain (progression) was evaluated using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) pain questionnaire. Progression was presented as actual change (Δ) after 2 years, and as progression over 2 years based on a per patient fitted regression line using 0, 0.5, 1 and 2-year values. Differences in predicted-progression scores between actual progressors and non-progressors were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) reported. Using Youden's index, optimal cut-offs were chosen to enable evaluation of both predicted-progression scores to identify actual progressors. RESULTS: Actual structural progressors were initially assigned higher S predicted-progression scores compared with structural non-progressors. Likewise, actual pain progressors were assigned higher P predicted-progression scores compared with pain non-progressors. The AUC-ROC for the S predicted-progression score to identify actual structural progressors was poor (0.612 and 0.599 for Δ and regression minJSW, respectively). The AUC-ROC for the P predicted-progression score to identify actual pain progressors were good (0.817 and 0.830 for Δ and regression KOOS pain, respectively). CONCLUSION: The S and P predicted-progression scores as provided by the ML models developed and used for the selection of IMI-APPROACH patients were to some degree able to distinguish between actual progressors and non-progressors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03883568.

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, biomarkers, clinical trials and methods, study design, Pharmacology (medical), Rheumatology, Journal Article

Citation

van Helvoort, E M, Jansen, M P, Marijnissen, A C A, Kloppenburg, M, Blanco, F J, Haugen, I K, Berenbaum, F, Bay-Jensen, A-C C, Ladel, C, Lalande, A, Larkin, J, Loughlin, J, Mobasheri, A, Weinans, H H, Widera, P, Bacardit, J, Welsing, P M J & Lafeber, F P J G 2023, 'Predicted and actual 2-year structural and pain progression in the IMI-APPROACH knee osteoarthritis cohort', Rheumatology (Oxford, England), vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac292