Using hypothetical learning trajectories

Publication date

2018

Authors

Bakker, ArthurORCID 0000-0002-9604-3448ISNI 0000000392965936
Smit, JantienISNI 0000000419438053

Editors

Bakker, A.

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

This chapter focuses on using hypothetical learning trajectories, in particular how they can be compared with the observed learning of four case study students. It addresses the question of how insights from design research can be presented in a succinct form. The chapter explores whether a conjecture map would be useful for communicating the main insights from J. Smit's design research project. Design principles and conjecture maps are different things but can capture similar ideas. A major difference is that design principles in Van den Akker's format do not specify mediating processes, whereas they are explicit in conjecture maps. Furthermore, while design principles are formulated in practical advisory terms, conjecture maps are more research oriented. One could also use multiple conjecture maps to show progression. Sometimes people who read about hypothetical learning trajectories initially consider them to be linear.

Keywords

Taverne

Citation

Bakker, A & Smit, J 2018, Using hypothetical learning trajectories. in A Bakker (ed.), Design research in education : A practical guide for early career researchers. Routledge, London, UK, pp. 255-271. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010-25