Methodological and Ethical Dilemmas in Research Among Smuggled Migrants
Publication date
2018-06-29
Editors
Zapata-Barrero, Ricard
Yalaz, Evren
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
This chapter is based on experiences from several research projects on human smuggling and reflects on methodological and ethical concerns when considering fieldwork with smuggled migrants. It is argued that, already from the start, ethical issues may be beyond the control of researchers, as professional review boards themselves are in a powerful position to set the terms for selecting who should be included in research projects and who not. While today it is acknowledged that taking the migrant’s perspective into account is valuable, there are still some challenges to be dealt with. This chapter touches upon the issues of gaining access to participants and building up trust in a context of mistrust and how narrations might be influenced by external structural factors such as the migration experience, policies and administrations, smugglers or the migrant community itself.
Keywords
Asylum Determination Process, Asylum Hearing, External Structural Factors, Human Smuggling, Vulnerable Migrants, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Citation
van Liempt, I & Bilger, V 2018, Methodological and Ethical Dilemmas in Research Among Smuggled Migrants. in R Zapata-Barrero & E Yalaz (eds), Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies. 1 edn, IMISCOE Research Series, Springer, Cham, pp. 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76861-8_15