Publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie
Files
Publication date
2018
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
The success of Airbnb and Uber has given rise to a public debate about the pros and cons of online sharing and gig platforms. This article reports on five case studies of platforms operating in car sharing (SnappCar), home sharing (Airbnb), home restaurants (Airdnd), ride hailing (UberPop) and cleaning (Helpling). The article then puts the sharing and gig economy into a historical perspective to highlight that the platforms build on pre-existing social practices. and presents a policy framework based on four basic policy options: enforce existing regulations, enact new regulations, deregulate, or tolerate.
Keywords
Airbnb, Uber, platform, regulation, sharing, Taverne
Citation
Frenken, K, van Waes, A H M, Smink, M & Van Est, R 2018, 'Publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie', Mens en Maatschappij, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 211-230. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN