Temporal trends in heart failure medication prescription in a population-based cohort study
Publication date
2021-03-02
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined temporal heart failure (HF) prescription patterns in a large representative sample of real-world patients in the UK, using electronic health records (EHR). METHODS: From primary and secondary care EHR, we identified 85 732 patients with a HF diagnosis between 2002 and 2015. Almost 50% of patients with HF were women and the median age was 79.1 (IQR 70.2-85.7) years, with age at diagnosis increasing over time. RESULTS: We found several trends in pharmacological HF management, including increased beta blocker prescriptions over time (29% in 2002-2005 and 54% in 2013-2015), which was not observed for mineralocorticoid receptor-antagonists (MR-antagonists) (18% in 2002-2005 and 18% in 2013-2015); higher prescription rates of loop diuretics in women and elderly patients together with lower prescription rates of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers or MR-antagonists in these patients; little change in medication prescription rates occurred after 6 months of HF diagnosis and, finally, patients hospitalised for HF who had no recorded follow-up in primary care had considerably lower prescription rates compared with patients with a HF diagnosis in primary care with or without HF hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: In the general population, the use of MR-antagonists for HF remained low and did not change throughout 13 years of follow-up. For most patients, few changes were seen in pharmacological management of HF in the 6 months following diagnosis.
Keywords
cardiac epidemiology, heart failure, public health, General Medicine
Citation
Uijl, A, Vaartjes, I, Denaxas, S, Hemingway, H, Shah, A, Cleland, J, Grobbee, D, Hoes, A, Asselbergs, F W & Koudstaal, S 2021, 'Temporal trends in heart failure medication prescription in a population-based cohort study', BMJ Open, vol. 11, no. 3, e043290, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043290