Learning Non-Adjacent Dependencies: A Mechanism for Language Acquisition

Publication date

2017-06-16

Authors

Grama, Ileana C.ISNI 0000000391164897

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Wijnen, FrankORCID 0000-0002-7196-6000ISNI 0000000080166000
Coopmans, PeterISNI 0000000042312388

DOI

Document Type

Dissertation
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This dissertation explores the human ability for non-adjacent dependency-learning, which allows adults and infants to detect the relationship between a and b in an aXb string. I use artificial grammar learning with adults and infants to investigate whether non-adjacent dependency-learning could facilitate the detection of morpho-syntactic dependencies in natural languages (The princess is gently kissing the frog). Morpho-syntactic dependencies are typically instantiated between functional morphemes (is, -ing), straddling lexical morphemes (gently, kiss). Functional morphemes are often less prosodically prominent than lexical ones. I investigate the role that this prosodic contrast could play in non-adjacent dependency-learning: both adults and infants learn aXb dependencies when a/b are prosodically prominent, but also when they are prosodically weak compared to the intervening X, similar to functional morphemes straddling a lexical word. The prosodic properties of natural languages could thus facilitate non-adjacent dependency learning. Secondly, children seem to become familiar with the individual units of a morpho-syntactic dependency beforree learning the dependency itself. I investigate how prior familiarity with a/b impacts learning aXb dependencies for adults. Previous findings suggest a negative effect of prior familiarity with a/b, but I find that these results are based on a confound relating to the sequential presentation of two learning phases (learning a/bs, and learning aXb dependencies). Eliminating this confound, I find no significant disadvantage of prior familiarity with a/b. Finally, I show that adults can generalize a_b dependencies to novel aX’b strings (with unfamiliar X’), but, 18-month-olds show no such generalization. Young learners may only be able to track dependencies in familiar contexts.

Keywords

non-adjacent dependencies, infant, artificial grammar, statistical learning, prosodic cues, starting small

Citation

Grama, I C 2017, 'Learning Non-Adjacent Dependencies: A Mechanism for Language Acquisition', Universiteit Utrecht.