Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , 90X_main.pdf (303.05 KB)

Publication date

2014

Authors

Freestone, D.
Johnson, D.
Ardron, J.
Unger, S.
Killerlain Morrison, K.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

United Nations discussions on the governance of marine areas beyond national jurisdiction have questioned, but not yet reached a decision, on whether existing institutional agreements and structures are sufficient to meet global commitments to protect marine biodiversity, or if additional mechanisms may be required. This paper considers two very different efforts to protect marine biodiversity in these areas: (1) in the North-East Atlantic through the efforts of OSPAR Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic; and (2) in the central Atlantic, through the efforts of the Sargasso Sea Alliance led by the Bermuda government. In each case, action has been strongly supported by non-governmental organisations and subsequent progress has hinged upon on-going dedicated efforts of “champion” governments to bring other States on board. This paper outlines the difficulties that they have faced, and consequently why they have been time-consuming, and are not yet completed. The paper then considers 10 common recommendations that can be drawn from the experiences of these two distinct initiatives, and their relevance to on-going UN deliberations.

Keywords

High seas, Biological diversity, Areas beyond national jurisdiction, ABNJ, MPA, Marine governance, SDG 14 - Life Below Water

Citation

Freestone, D, Johnson, D, Ardron, J, Unger, S & Killerlain Morrison, K 2014, 'Can existing institutions protect biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction? Experiences from two on-going processes', Marine Policy, vol. 49, pp. 167-175 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.12.007