“Aren’t we all journalists?” Citizen journalism, disinformation and the weaponization of social media in conflict torn Mali
Publication date
2025-05
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
The study combines domain expertise and computational community detection to uncover what role citizen journalists and social media platforms play in mediating the dynamics of conflict in Mali. Under conditions of the growing conflict in Mali, citizen journalists are opening Twitter (rebranded as X) accounts to stay updated and tweet about the ongoing socio-political tensions, chronicling life in a conflict-ravaged context. This article conceptualizes the rapid reliance on Twitter among citizen journalists consisting of bloggers, activists, government officials and NGO’s as a form of networked conflict and networked journalism. Networked journalism emerges as professional journalists adopt tools and techniques used by nonprofessionals (and vice versa) to gather and disseminate information while networked conflict involves the consequential and intricate relationship between social media and conflict in the Sahel region of Africa. Our findings show that Twitter is a source of action that promotes and mediates conflict, which exposes users to conflict-related content. The findings also show that what accounts for citizen journalism in a conflict setting is vague as those with access to Twitter and as such, the presumed ability to influence the narrative, unequivocally consider themselves citizen journalists.
Keywords
Africa, citizen journalism, conflict, disinformation, global south, Mali, mixed methods, social media, Communication, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Citation
de Bruijn, M, Mutsvairo, B, Bruls, L, Cissé, M G, Langguth, J, Orgeret, K S, Badji, S D, Moges, M A & Schroeder, D T 2025, '“Aren’t we all journalists?” Citizen journalism, disinformation and the weaponization of social media in conflict torn Mali', Journalism, vol. 26, pp. 1027-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241312743