Walter Warner (ca.1557-1643) and his notes on Animal Organisms
Publication date
1992-10-23
Authors
Prins, Johannes Lambertus Maria
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Dissertation
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
As opposed to most of his contemporaries, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) assumed that all
phenomena could be explained in terms of matter in motion. All the more intriguing is his
suggestion that what he wrote came out of his own head. Yet, already during his lifetime he was
accused of having taken his natural philosophy from the mathematician and natural philosopher
Walter Warner (ca. 1557-1643). Warner’s posthumous notes were said to suggest that he worked
on the development of a natural philosophical system, based on atomism. According to some
historians Hobbes’ materialistic and mechanistic psychology would have been marked
substantially by Warner’s ideas on the physiological and psychological functions of animal
organisms. This investigation was triggered by that suggestion. It centres on the following
questions: Up to what point Warner’s reputation as an early representative of materialism or a
mechanical philosophy is justified by what is known about his life and work? What were his ideas
about the vital functions of animal organisms and to what extent does he show himself in that
respect to be a materialist or a mechanical philosopher? What was the influence of these ideas on
Hobbes? Historical research gives the impression that only near the end of his life did Warner get
some recognition as a scientist, i.e. as a mathematician and optical scientist. If he was indeed the
writer of the notes ascribed to him, Warner had changed from an eclectical Aristotelian into a
corspuscularist. However that may be, the notes on animal organisms were not written by an
atomist but inspired by a mixture of elements from the Scholastic tradition and ideas
characteristic of Italian natural philosophy from the last quarter of the sixteenth century. His talks
with Warner might have strengthened Hobbes in his materialist-mechanist views. Yet, there is
nothing to justify the claim that in this Warner had a substantial influence on Hobbes. Apart from
the fact that their views differ in many respects, Hobbes had already laid the foundations of his
philosophical system before getting acquinted with Warner.
Keywords
History, Natural philosophy, Mechanism, Physiology, Psychology, Thomas Hobbes, Walter Warner