Antecedents of managers’ people management: Using the AMO model to explain differences in hrm implementation and leadership

Publication date

2021-03-18

Authors

Knies, EvaISNI 0000000391031760
de Beeck, Sophie Op
Hondeghem, Annie

Editors

Leisink, Peter
Andersen, Lotte Bøgh
Brewer, Gene A
Jacobsen, Christian Bøtcher
Knies, Eva
Vandenabeele, Wouter

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This chapter examines managers’ role in people management within a public sector setting and the factors explaining differences in people management performance between managers. The main question guiding this contribution is: What are the antecedents (favoring and hindering factors) of public managers’ HRM implementation and leadership behavior? The AMO model is used as a conceptual framework to map and examine the antecedents of public managers’ people management. Under the Ability category of the AMO model, the focus is on managers’ people management abilities and management development. Under the Motivation category, the focus is on managers’ willingness to take up people management responsibilities and their priorities. Under the Opportunities category, support from different organizational stakeholders (HR department, upper management, etc.) and (personnel) red tape are covered. As such, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the impact that typical public sector characteristics have on managers’ people management performance.

Keywords

AMO model, HRM implementation, Leadership, Line managers, People management, Public sector, Taverne, Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all), General Business,Management and Accounting, General Social Sciences

Citation

Knies, E, de Beeck, S O & Hondeghem, A 2021, Antecedents of managers’ people management : Using the AMO model to explain differences in hrm implementation and leadership. in P Leisink, L B Andersen, G A Brewer, C B Jacobsen, E Knies & W Vandenabeele (eds), Managing for Public Service Performance : How People and Values Make a Difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893420.003.0007