Indications of Settlement Provenance and the Duty of Non-recognition Under International Law
Publication date
2019
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
In its 2015 “Interpretative Notice on indication of origin of goods from the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967”, the European Commission linked the indication of origin of products from Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories to the duty of non-recognition under international law, i.e., a duty not to recognize illegal situations. In its Psagot judgment (judgment of 12 November 2019, case C-363/18 [GC]), however, the CJEU did not engage with this duty, but limits itself to interpreting EU consumer law. It is argued that disputes over the application and interpretation of consumer law indeed do not lend themselves well to the application of the duty of non-recognition. The question remains, however, whether conducting trade relations as regards settlement products amounts to an implicit recognition of Israeli settlement policy in the occupied territories.
Keywords
duty of non-recognition, peremptory norms, public international law, consumer law, settlements, occupation, Taverne
Citation
Ryngaert, C M J 2019, 'Indications of Settlement Provenance and the Duty of Non-recognition Under International Law', European Papers, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 791-799. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/342