Risk factor clustering in men and women with CHD in the Southern Cone of Latin America

Publication date

2023-03

Authors

Marzà-Florensa, AnnaORCID 0000-0003-0338-4292
Gutierrez, Laura
Gulayin, Pablo
Vaartjes, IloncaORCID 0000-0002-9951-5164ISNI 0000000392724702
Grobbee, RickORCID 0000-0003-4472-4468ISNI 0000000030206553
Klipstein-Grobusch, KerstinORCID 0000-0002-5462-9889ISNI 0000000016414268
Irazola, Vilma

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Background Presence of multiple risk factors (RF) increases the risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and this is especially important in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The current study investigates sex differences in the presence of multiple cardiovascular RF in subjects with established CHD in the southern Cone of Latin America. Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 634 participants aged 35–74 with CHD from the community-based CESCAS Study. We calculated the prevalence for counts of cardiometabolic (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, diabetes) and lifestyle (current smoking, unhealthy diet, low physical activity, excessive alcohol consumption) RF. Differences in RF number between men and women were tested with age-adjusted Poisson regression. We identified the most common RF combinations among participants with ≥4 RF. We performed a subgroup analysis by educational level. Results The prevalence of cardiometabolic RF ranged from 76.3% (hypertension) to 26.8% (diabetes), and the prevalence of lifestyle RF from 81.9% (unhealthy diet) to 4.3% (excessive alcohol consumption). Obesity, central obesity, diabetes and low physical activity were more common in women, while excessive alcohol consumption and unhealthy diet were more common in men. Close to 85% of women and 81.5% of men presented with ≥4 RF. Women presented with a higher number of overall (relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08) and cardiometabolic RF (1.17, 1.09–1.25). These sex differences were found in participants with primary education (RR women overall RF 1.08, 1.00–1.15, cardiometabolic RF 1.23, 1.09–1.39), but were diluted in those with higher educational attainment. The most common RF combination was hypertension/dyslipidemia/obesity/unhealthy diet. Conclusion Overall, women showed a higher burden of multiple cardiovascular RF. Sex differences persisted in participants with low educational attainment, and women with low educational level had the highest RF burden.

Keywords

Cardiovascular RF, Education, Secondary prevention, Sex differences

Citation

Marzà-Florensa, A, Gutierrez, L, Gulayin, P, Vaartjes, I, Grobbee, D E, Klipstein-Grobusch, K & Irazola, V 2023, 'Risk factor clustering in men and women with CHD in the Southern Cone of Latin America', International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, vol. 16, 200172, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200172