Progressive orocline formation in the Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus
Files
Publication date
2017
Editors
Sosson, M.
Stephenson, R.A.
Adamia, S.A.
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
The Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus fold–thrust belt displays a peculiar northwards arc-shaped geometry that was defined as an orocline in earlier studies. The Lesser Caucasus was affected by two main tectonic events that could have caused orocline formation: (1) Paleocene–Eocene collision of the South Armenian Block with Eurasia; and (2) Oligocene–Miocene Arabia–Eurasia collision. We tested the hypothesis that the Lesser Caucasus is an orocline and aimed to time the formation of this orocline. To determine the vertical axis rotations, 37 sites were sampled for palaeomagnetism in rocks of Upper Cretaceous–Miocene age in Georgia and Armenia. In addition, we compiled a review of c. 100 available datasets. A strike test was applied to the remaining datasets, which were divided into four chronological sub-sets, leading us to conclude that the Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus fold–thrust belt forms a progressive orocline. We 0concluded that: (1) some pre-existing curvature must have been present before the Late Cretaceous; (2) the orocline acquired part of its curvature after the Paleocene and before the Middle Eocene as a result of South Armenian Block–Eurasia collision; and (3) about 50% of the curvature formed after the Eocene and probably before the Late Miocene, probably as a result of Arabia–Eurasia collision.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Meijers, M J M, Smith, B, Pastor-Galán, D, Degenaar, R, Sadradze, N, Adamia, S, Sahakyan, L, Avagyan, A, Sosson, M, Rolland, Y, Langereis, C G & Müller, C 2017, Progressive orocline formation in the Eastern Pontides–Lesser Caucasus. in M Sosson, R A Stephenson & S A Adamia (eds), Tectonic evolution of the eastern Black Sea and Caucasus. vol. 428, Geological Society of London Special Publications, vol. 428, Geological Society, London, pp. 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP428.8