Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations
Files
Publication date
2019-03-01
Authors
Rinkel, Willem D.
van der Oest, Mark J.W.
Dijkstra, Don A.
Castro Cabezas, Manuel
Coert, J Henk
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend screening the feet of diabetic subjects with a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork. We investigated which tests and locations on the feet have the best predictive value regarding 1-year ulcer-free survival in diabetic subjects participating in the prospective Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study. Methods: Decision tree analysis was used to predict ulcer-free survival based on responses from individual test locations (monofilaments on 10 sites, vibration sense was tested on both halluces and medial malleoli). Separate trees for patients with and without a history of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) were developed. Results: Four hundred sixteen subjects (mean [SD] age, 61.8 years [12.4]; range, 21.6-90.2) were measured, of whom 24 developed new DFUs. Three tests exhibited discriminative and predictive properties: testing vibration sense on the medial malleolus and monofilament testing on heel and hallux. The decision tree to predict ulcer-free survival in patients with a history of DFU yielded a sensitivity of 87.0%, which was 99.6% for the tree of patients without a history of DFU. Conclusion: The findings of this study aids medical decision making by discriminating between high- and low-risk patients of developing DFU using selective testing on sites with predictive properties.
Keywords
decision making, diabetic foot ulcer, prediction, risk assessment, sensory testing, Taverne, Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Endocrinology
Citation
Rinkel, W D, van der Oest, M J W, Dijkstra, D A, Castro Cabezas, M & Coert, J H 2019, 'Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations', Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 35, no. 3, e3119. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3119