Productive versus vicarious failure: Do students need to fail themselves in order to learn?

Publication date

2022-11-01

Authors

Hartmann, Christian
van Gog, TamaraISNI 0000000387224834
Rummel, Nikol

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Productive Failure is an instructional approach in which students engage in problem-solving attempts prior to instruction. The Productive Failure approach has been found to be more supportive for conceptual knowledge acquisition during subsequent instruction compared to a direct-instruction condition in which students receive instruction first followed by problem solving. Failing at problem-solving attempts prior to instruction is considered to prepare students to better understand the concepts underlying the problem. However, it is an open question whether students need to fail themselves to be effectively prepared for subsequent instruction. We therefore compared the effectiveness of two alternative preparatory activities: Students either engaged in problem-solving attempts themselves or were shown problem-solving attempts of another student. This experimental variation allows to show the necessity of own failure for the effectiveness of the PF approach. The results indicated that the two conditions were equally effective at preparing students for subsequent instruction.

Keywords

conceptual knowledge acquisition, example-based learning, observational learning, productive failure, vicarious failure, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Citation

Hartmann, C, van Gog, T & Rummel, N 2022, 'Productive versus vicarious failure : Do students need to fail themselves in order to learn?', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1219-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4004