Routine Blood Tests Do Not Predict Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma—Multivariable Analysis of 497 Patients

Publication date

2019-06-01

Authors

Maas, Sybren L N
Draaisma, Kaspar
Snijders, T. J.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-081XISNI 000000039373112X
Senders, Joeky T
Berendsen, Sharon
Seute, TatjanaORCID 0000-0002-3668-6177
Schiffelers, RaymondORCID 0000-0002-1012-9815ISNI 0000000045237985
Van Solinge, Wouter W.ORCID 0000-0003-2867-2581ISNI 0000000394265028
Ten Berg, Maarten JISNI 0000000397111585
Robe, Pierre AORCID 0000-0001-7845-6196

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Background: Multiple reports have attributed a prognostic value to routine blood tests results for patients with glioblastoma. However, these studies have reported conflicting results and have often had small sample sizes. We sought to validate the prognostic value of the described tests in an independent glioblastoma patient population. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center multivariable analysis of 497 patients with glioblastoma who had postoperatively undergone radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy to identify the prognostic value for median overall survival of hemoglobin, white blood cell, monocyte, neutrophil, leukocyte, and platelet counts, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and lactate dehydrogenase. We also evaluated known prognostic factors for survival such as patient age, intervention type, IDH1 status, Karnofsky clinical performance status, and postoperative treatment modality. Results: In a multivariable model, after correcting for multiple testing bias, biopsy alone (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.26–0.49; false discovery rate-adjusted P < 0.001) and monotherapy after surgery (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.66; false discovery rate-adjusted P < 0.001) remained significantly associated with worse median overall survival. Patient age and Karnofsky performance status score ≥70 did not significantly influence survival in the multivariable model. No routine blood test included in the multivariable analysis was significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: In the present study, hemoglobin, white blood cell, monocyte, neutrophil, leukocyte, and platelet counts, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and lactate dehydrogenase levels did not independently predict for overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Keywords

Biomarkers, Blood tests, Glioblastoma, Hemoglobin, Prognostic markers, Prognosticators, Survival, Taverne, Clinical Neurology, Surgery, Journal Article

Citation

Maas, S L N, Draaisma, K, Snijders, T J, Senders, J T, Berendsen, S, Seute, T, Schiffelers, R M, van Solinge, W W, Ten Berg, M J, Robe, P A & Broekman, M L D 2019, 'Routine Blood Tests Do Not Predict Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma—Multivariable Analysis of 497 Patients', World Neurosurgery, vol. 126, pp. e1081-e1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.053